In my writing I have noticed that I tend to have many run on sentences especially on my first draft because I like to just write what ever is on my mind with out thinking about any grammatical errors. This gets very overwhelming sometimes, I feel like my writing seems very unprofessional because I know how to correct them but I happen to forget to. It is difficult for me to avoid sometimes, but I am going to try to revise my essays thoroughly to avoid these errors.
I have also noticed that I use these common words: "like", "that," "which", and "and." I feel that using these words so often and very frequently makes my essays seem as if a high school student wrote my essay. In order for me to avoid such issue I am going to reword many of my sentences and avoid using these three words very often.
In some cases I don't always specify what I am talking about. I notice that am talking about something and then end up talking about something else. This is more likely to confuse my readers and they may loose their interest in my writing. I know that I have done these errors a lot, but sometimes I don't want to be so repetitive. However, I will try my best to make sure I specify the topic or person I am talking about throughout my paragraphs, so my papers will be relevant.
Friday, March 30, 2012
Friday, March 16, 2012
Assignment Ten: Thinking Critically About Peer Review
I find the peer review discussions in class very helpful, especially when I have good peer reviewers. When I do, I get a good understanding of the assignment's requirements. My peer reviewers are usually very helpful; however, there are other peer reviewers confuse me even more. But other than that, I think that it's really helpful because I get more ideas on what to write about in my essays. It helps me come up with new things to write about by looking at other people's essays and by the feed back of my peer reviewers. We spend a great amount of time peer reviewing which gives me a lot of time to go through my essay careful and fixing all types errors. I think that the questions we receive for peer editing are a bit helpful; although, they can be a bit repetitive. I believe I am a tough peer reviewer. When I review my paper, I write comments like "this is dumb" or other mean things, but the only reason why I say things like this is because it's my own paper, and I feel that I write many things that do not make sense. For other people I try not to be very mean; however, I do tell people that they need to reword sentences or come up with better ideas. I am very honest when it comes to telling someone that their paper doesn't make sense or that they need to keep working on it because doesn't have certain requirements, only because I am trying to help them. My weaknesses are that I may not be as clear as I am supposed to be in answering peer review questions and such.
My ideal peer review process would be having more than one or two person read my paper helpful so that I get more people's ideas. I think that the peer review should have a check list instead of having so many questions. Including some questions would be fine, but not so many. We are given the right amount of time for peer reviewing it gives me enough time for a person to read and review my essay and for me to review other people's essay.
Friday, March 9, 2012
Assignment Nine: A Choice in Topics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)